“My dear friends from India, no system is perfect. Cost-benefit
analysis is what should guide you in deciding what system you should adopt. The
decentralized or bottom-up approach to governance was adopted by the founders
of United States and we still continue to follow this system. The reason – the
benefits to the society is far higher than the cost being incurred. We think as
entrepreneurs. And if we face any threat to this system, I feel that there is
one quality of our nation which will keep us on the right track. And that is
flexibility, my friend.”
 |
| Akram Elias |
Staring into our eyes, Mr. Akram Elias, Founder and CEO of Capital Communications Group, was sitting right across the big oak table in the
executive board room of Lowes Madison Hotel and was animatedly replying to my
question on the demerits of the decentralized government now that US had been practicing
it for so many years. Capital Communications Group is an international
consulting firm whose members have expertise in current political, business,
social and cultural issues. CCG provides a variety of services to government
and private clients in the areas of public diplomacy, cultural awareness,
strategic language services, media and communication strategies, and
orientations to Washington, DC.
In the social order of US, an individual is on the highest pedestal
and is the sole focus of all the activities. No group or no collective is above
an individual when it comes to taking key decisions here. Laid by the founding
fathers of US, the thinking was carried further by the generations of leaders.
‘I am an individual and no one, not even the government, can or should decide
how should I behave or how should I develop. That sole right is mine’ – is the
basic premise here. Absence of any censorship in this country verifies this. Whereas,
we in India say ‘akela chana bhaad nahin fod sakta’ (you can’t do anything
alone) and there is lot of emphasis on group work and collaboration right from
our school days. US being a land of immigrants, it is believed that the talents
could be retained only if they are given the freedom to flourish. That explains
the three freedoms guaranteed by the US constitution – freedom of speech, of
religion and of association. One then wonders about the ‘association’ and hence
the role of civil societies on the landscape of US. Strangely, they are the
most active ones and mostly responsible for bringing any change in the policy
or law, or bringing altogether a new policy or law by pressurizing the
government. If you flip the pages of history, Akram said pounding on the table,
you’ll see behind any policy or law there has been an involvement of one or
other civil society.
In the economic order of US, small enterprise is the basic unit. ‘In
the pursuit of happiness’ those who come to US are provided with ample
opportunities. And that is the role government plays here – facilitating these
small entrepreneurs of the country by creating an environment conducive to the
growth of the small enterprise. One of the key issues over which the last
election was fought was the taxation on the small enterprises and the big
corporations. Interestingly, in the recent budget of India also, there is a
heavy emphasis on promoting the SMEs.
In the political order, though the state government is the basic
unit, is what Akram says, there is further decentralization by the formation of
counties within a state. The 50 states are like 50 countries and free to
operate the way they want to. Every state has its own constitution and set of
laws to rule. There is further devolvement of the power by the formation of
counties who can take key decisions on education, police and other important
things. As you can see, the real power lies with the state and not the federal
government. Akram advised us to forget the three terms – centre, central and
centralised – during our course of stay in US. It has been a bottom-up approach
to governance. The states felt the need to defend them from the external powers
and keep the union intact, and hence came together to form the federal
government. The defence was the sole purpose for which the federal government
was formed. Everything else – dollar, foreign policy, and federal laws –
followed. Politics is run as an enterprise here and all the politicians are
entrepreneurs. While briefing on the House of Representatives and Senate, Akram
took us through the entrepreneurial journey of a politician.
Finally Akram told us about few visits he had made to India and how he felt that the youngsters there are high on energy and smartness. What is required is unleashing their energies and channelising the same.
Coming from India, it was altogether new, and contrasting to what we
see, observe and experience back in our country. The day left our group
debating and discussing the various ideas and thoughts that we can pick for our
country.